Wind Turbine Payback in Chattooga County, GA
Wind turbine payback in Chattooga County
No. The turbine wears out before it pays for itself.
At 30 m, the height a home turbine tower usually reaches, the wind in Chattooga County, GA averages 3.18 m/s (7.1 mph). A 10 kW turbine there would make about 3,165 kWh a year, worth $490 at GA's 15.48¢/kWh. Against an installed cost of about $100,000, that is a payback of over 100 years, and the turbine is built to last about 20.
What to do in Chattooga County
A home turbine is not worth buying for savings in Chattooga County unless your spot is far windier than the county average, 7.8 m/s at the hub against 3.18 m/s here. Per kW, solar panels would make about 1,288 kWh a year here against the turbine's 317, so get a solar quote first.
What would have to change
- Power would have to cost 158¢/kWh, 10.2 times what GA pays now.
- Or the average wind at the hub would have to be 7.8 m/s instead of 3.18. A taller tower or an exposed ridge can add some of that; a rooftop never will.
Against the rest of GA
Chattooga County is the 2,904th windiest of 3,144 US counties at turbine height; the national middle is 4.79 m/s. The windiest in GA is Glynn County at 5.08 m/s, payback 49 years.
Month by month in Chattooga County
March is the strongest month here, at 3.72 m/s and about 447 kWh. July is the weakest, 2.40 m/s and 98 kWh, so the best month makes 4.6 times the worst. November to March brings in 58% of the year's output in Chattooga County.
| Month | Wind at 30 m | Output | Worth |
|---|---|---|---|
| January | 3.64 m/s | 415 kWh | $64 |
| February | 3.73 m/s | 407 kWh | $63 |
| March | 3.72 m/s | 447 kWh | $69 |
| April | 3.68 m/s | 419 kWh | $65 |
| May | 3.07 m/s | 240 kWh | $37 |
| June | 2.62 m/s | 132 kWh | $20 |
| July | 2.40 m/s | 98 kWh | $15 |
| August | 2.42 m/s | 101 kWh | $16 |
| September | 2.79 m/s | 165 kWh | $26 |
| October | 3.17 m/s | 266 kWh | $41 |
| November | 3.42 m/s | 330 kWh | $51 |
| December | 3.48 m/s | 359 kWh | $56 |
What a taller tower would buy
Measured at 10 m the wind in Chattooga County averages 1.97 m/s; at 50 m it is 3.97 m/s. That gives a shear exponent of 0.435, typical of rough, sheltered ground: trees or buildings slow the low wind a lot. Going from 20 m to 50 m takes output from 1,714 to 6,428 kWh a year, 275% more, before counting the extra cost of the taller tower. Why tower height decides it explains the shear behind these numbers.
| Hub height | Average wind | Output | Payback |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20 m | 2.66 m/s | 1,714 kWh | over 100 years |
| 30 m | 3.18 m/s | 3,162 kWh | over 100 years |
| 40 m | 3.6 m/s | 4,747 kWh | over 100 years |
| 50 m | 3.97 m/s | 6,428 kWh | over 100 years |
Counties around Chattooga County
1 of the 6 closest counties is windier at turbine height; the windiest, Dade County, averages 3.22 m/s.
- Floyd County, GA: 3.07 m/s, 2,813 kWh, payback over 100 years (16 mi)
- Walker County, GA: 3.07 m/s, 2,813 kWh, payback over 100 years (18 mi)
- DeKalb County, AL: 3.18 m/s, 3,165 kWh, payback over 100 years (26 mi)
- Gordon County, GA: 3.07 m/s, 2,813 kWh, payback over 100 years (27 mi)
- Dade County, GA: 3.22 m/s, 3,299 kWh, payback over 100 years (28 mi)
- Whitfield County, GA: 3.17 m/s, 3,132 kWh, payback over 100 years (31 mi)
Sun versus wind in Chattooga County
Chattooga County gets 4.41 kWh of sunshine per square metre a day on average. One kW of solar panels here would make roughly 1,288 kWh a year; one kW of the turbine above makes 317. Kilowatt for kilowatt, panels make 4.1 times as much here as the turbine. Panel output assumes an 80% system performance ratio. Wind or solar runs the same comparison for every county.
How this is worked out
Wind is NASA's Power climate record, the 2001-2025 average at 10 m and 50 m for the county's centre, carried to 30 m with this county's own measured wind shear and spread into hours with a Rayleigh distribution. The turbine is a generic 10 kW, 7 m rotor machine with 10% losses. Cost is $10,000 per kW installed with no tax credit, because the federal one ended in 2025. One county-centre number cannot see your hilltop or your tree line, so treat it as the starting point for a site survey, not a substitute. The full method and its weak spots are in how the numbers are made.