Wind Turbine Payback in Chesapeake city, VA
Wind turbine payback in Chesapeake city
No. The turbine wears out before it pays for itself.
At 30 m, the height a home turbine tower usually reaches, the wind in Chesapeake city, VA averages 5.82 m/s (13 mph). A 10 kW turbine there would make about 18,374 kWh a year, worth $3,114 at VA's 16.95¢/kWh. Against an installed cost of about $100,000, that is a payback of 32 years, and the turbine is built to last about 20.
What to do in Chesapeake city
A home turbine is not worth buying for savings in Chesapeake city unless your spot is far windier than the county average, 7.3 m/s at the hub against 5.82 m/s here. Per kW, solar panels would make about 1,270 kWh a year here against the turbine's 1,837, so get a solar quote first.
What would have to change
- Power would have to cost 27¢/kWh, 1.6 times what VA pays now.
- Or the average wind at the hub would have to be 7.3 m/s instead of 5.82. A taller tower or an exposed ridge can add some of that; a rooftop never will.
Against the rest of VA
Chesapeake city is the 1,048th windiest of 3,144 US counties at turbine height; the national middle is 4.79 m/s. The windiest in VA is Northampton County at 7.01 m/s, payback 22 years.
Month by month in Chesapeake city
March is the strongest month here, at 6.64 m/s and about 2,073 kWh. August is the weakest, 4.56 m/s and 822 kWh, so the best month makes 2.5 times the worst. November to March brings in 50% of the year's output in Chesapeake city.
| Month | Wind at 30 m | Output | Worth |
|---|---|---|---|
| January | 6.46 m/s | 1,962 kWh | $333 |
| February | 6.53 m/s | 1,812 kWh | $307 |
| March | 6.64 m/s | 2,073 kWh | $351 |
| April | 6.65 m/s | 2,012 kWh | $341 |
| May | 5.82 m/s | 1,563 kWh | $265 |
| June | 5.06 m/s | 1,066 kWh | $181 |
| July | 4.86 m/s | 985 kWh | $167 |
| August | 4.56 m/s | 822 kWh | $139 |
| September | 5.41 m/s | 1,267 kWh | $215 |
| October | 5.71 m/s | 1,490 kWh | $253 |
| November | 6.06 m/s | 1,654 kWh | $280 |
| December | 6.20 m/s | 1,799 kWh | $305 |
What a taller tower would buy
Measured at 10 m the wind in Chesapeake city averages 4.57 m/s; at 50 m it is 6.52 m/s. That gives a shear exponent of 0.221, typical of ordinary open country. Going from 20 m to 50 m takes output from 14,784 to 23,554 kWh a year, 59% more, before counting the extra cost of the taller tower. Why tower height decides it explains the shear behind these numbers.
| Hub height | Average wind | Output | Payback |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20 m | 5.32 m/s | 14,784 kWh | 40 years |
| 30 m | 5.82 m/s | 18,403 kWh | 32 years |
| 40 m | 6.21 m/s | 21,234 kWh | 28 years |
| 50 m | 6.52 m/s | 23,554 kWh | 25 years |
Counties around Chesapeake city
4 of the 6 closest counties are windier at turbine height; the windiest, Portsmouth city, averages 5.92 m/s.
- Portsmouth city, VA: 5.92 m/s, 19,112 kWh, payback 31 years (13 mi)
- Virginia Beach city, VA: 5.92 m/s, 19,112 kWh, payback 31 years (17 mi)
- Norfolk city, VA: 5.92 m/s, 19,112 kWh, payback 31 years (17 mi)
- Suffolk city, VA: 5.06 m/s, 12,941 kWh, payback 46 years (18 mi)
- Camden County, NC: 5.82 m/s, 18,374 kWh, payback 36 years (25 mi)
- Hampton city, VA: 5.92 m/s, 19,112 kWh, payback 31 years (25 mi)
Sun versus wind in Chesapeake city
Chesapeake city gets 4.35 kWh of sunshine per square metre a day on average. One kW of solar panels here would make roughly 1,270 kWh a year; one kW of the turbine above makes 1,837. This is one of the rare places where a kilowatt of turbine out-produces a kilowatt of panels, by 1.4 times. Panel output assumes an 80% system performance ratio. Wind or solar runs the same comparison for every county.
How this is worked out
Wind is NASA's Power climate record, the 2001-2025 average at 10 m and 50 m for the county's centre, carried to 30 m with this county's own measured wind shear and spread into hours with a Rayleigh distribution. The turbine is a generic 10 kW, 7 m rotor machine with 10% losses. Cost is $10,000 per kW installed with no tax credit, because the federal one ended in 2025. One county-centre number cannot see your hilltop or your tree line, so treat it as the starting point for a site survey, not a substitute. The full method and its weak spots are in how the numbers are made.