Wind Turbine Payback in Pottawatomie County, KS
Wind turbine payback in Pottawatomie County
No. The turbine wears out before it pays for itself.
At 30 m, the height a home turbine tower usually reaches, the wind in Pottawatomie County, KS averages 6.24 m/s (14 mph). A 10 kW turbine there would make about 21,484 kWh a year, worth $3,278 at KS's 15.26¢/kWh. Against an installed cost of about $100,000, that is a payback of 31 years, and the turbine is built to last about 20.
What to do in Pottawatomie County
A home turbine is not worth buying for savings in Pottawatomie County unless your spot is far windier than the county average, 7.8 m/s at the hub against 6.24 m/s here. Per kW, solar panels would make about 1,273 kWh a year here against the turbine's 2,148, so get a solar quote first.
What would have to change
- Power would have to cost 23¢/kWh, 1.5 times what KS pays now.
- Or the average wind at the hub would have to be 7.8 m/s instead of 6.24. A taller tower or an exposed ridge can add some of that; a rooftop never will.
Against the rest of KS
Pottawatomie County is the 541st windiest of 3,144 US counties at turbine height; the national middle is 4.79 m/s. The windiest in KS is Edwards County at 6.68 m/s, payback 27 years.
Month by month in Pottawatomie County
April is the strongest month here, at 7.15 m/s and about 2,309 kWh. August is the weakest, 5.09 m/s and 1,117 kWh, so the best month makes 2.1 times the worst. November to March brings in 46% of the year's output in Pottawatomie County.
| Month | Wind at 30 m | Output | Worth |
|---|---|---|---|
| January | 6.41 m/s | 1,931 kWh | $295 |
| February | 6.44 m/s | 1,759 kWh | $268 |
| March | 6.87 m/s | 2,218 kWh | $338 |
| April | 7.15 m/s | 2,309 kWh | $352 |
| May | 6.30 m/s | 1,863 kWh | $284 |
| June | 6.03 m/s | 1,635 kWh | $250 |
| July | 5.17 m/s | 1,164 kWh | $178 |
| August | 5.09 m/s | 1,117 kWh | $170 |
| September | 5.95 m/s | 1,592 kWh | $243 |
| October | 6.50 m/s | 1,986 kWh | $303 |
| November | 6.64 m/s | 2,008 kWh | $306 |
| December | 6.33 m/s | 1,880 kWh | $287 |
What a taller tower would buy
Measured at 10 m the wind in Pottawatomie County averages 4.86 m/s; at 50 m it is 7.01 m/s. That gives a shear exponent of 0.228, typical of ordinary open country. Going from 20 m to 50 m takes output from 17,407 to 27,114 kWh a year, 56% more, before counting the extra cost of the taller tower. Why tower height decides it explains the shear behind these numbers.
| Hub height | Average wind | Output | Payback |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20 m | 5.69 m/s | 17,407 kWh | 38 years |
| 30 m | 6.24 m/s | 21,479 kWh | 31 years |
| 40 m | 6.66 m/s | 24,599 kWh | 27 years |
| 50 m | 7.01 m/s | 27,114 kWh | 24 years |
Counties around Pottawatomie County
5 of the 6 closest counties are windier at turbine height; the windiest, Geary County, averages 6.35 m/s.
- Riley County, KS: 6.29 m/s, 21,855 kWh, payback 30 years (22 mi)
- Jackson County, KS: 6.17 m/s, 20,965 kWh, payback 31 years (29 mi)
- Marshall County, KS: 6.34 m/s, 22,225 kWh, payback 30 years (29 mi)
- Wabaunsee County, KS: 6.28 m/s, 21,781 kWh, payback 30 years (30 mi)
- Nemaha County, KS: 6.34 m/s, 22,225 kWh, payback 30 years (33 mi)
- Geary County, KS: 6.35 m/s, 22,299 kWh, payback 29 years (35 mi)
Sun versus wind in Pottawatomie County
Pottawatomie County gets 4.36 kWh of sunshine per square metre a day on average. One kW of solar panels here would make roughly 1,273 kWh a year; one kW of the turbine above makes 2,148. This is one of the rare places where a kilowatt of turbine out-produces a kilowatt of panels, by 1.7 times. Panel output assumes an 80% system performance ratio. Wind or solar runs the same comparison for every county.
How this is worked out
Wind is NASA's Power climate record, the 2001-2025 average at 10 m and 50 m for the county's centre, carried to 30 m with this county's own measured wind shear and spread into hours with a Rayleigh distribution. The turbine is a generic 10 kW, 7 m rotor machine with 10% losses. Cost is $10,000 per kW installed with no tax credit, because the federal one ended in 2025. One county-centre number cannot see your hilltop or your tree line, so treat it as the starting point for a site survey, not a substitute. The full method and its weak spots are in how the numbers are made.