Wind Turbine Payback in Calhoun County, IA
Wind turbine payback in Calhoun County
No. The turbine wears out before it pays for itself.
At 30 m, the height a home turbine tower usually reaches, the wind in Calhoun County, IA averages 6.4 m/s (14.3 mph). A 10 kW turbine there would make about 22,669 kWh a year, worth $3,298 at IA's 14.55¢/kWh. Against an installed cost of about $100,000, that is a payback of 30 years, and the turbine is built to last about 20.
What to do in Calhoun County
A home turbine is not worth buying for savings in Calhoun County unless your spot is far windier than the county average, 8.1 m/s at the hub against 6.4 m/s here. Per kW, solar panels would make about 1,186 kWh a year here against the turbine's 2,267, so get a solar quote first.
What would have to change
- Power would have to cost 22¢/kWh, 1.5 times what IA pays now.
- Or the average wind at the hub would have to be 8.1 m/s instead of 6.4. A taller tower or an exposed ridge can add some of that; a rooftop never will.
Against the rest of IA
Calhoun County is the 322nd windiest of 3,144 US counties at turbine height; the national middle is 4.79 m/s. The windiest in IA is Dickinson County at 6.59 m/s, payback 29 years.
Month by month in Calhoun County
April is the strongest month here, at 7.30 m/s and about 2,395 kWh. August is the weakest, 5.15 m/s and 1,154 kWh, so the best month makes 2.1 times the worst. November to March brings in 46% of the year's output in Calhoun County.
| Month | Wind at 30 m | Output | Worth |
|---|---|---|---|
| January | 6.73 m/s | 2,133 kWh | $310 |
| February | 6.73 m/s | 1,926 kWh | $280 |
| March | 6.92 m/s | 2,248 kWh | $327 |
| April | 7.30 m/s | 2,395 kWh | $348 |
| May | 6.65 m/s | 2,083 kWh | $303 |
| June | 5.93 m/s | 1,574 kWh | $229 |
| July | 5.19 m/s | 1,175 kWh | $171 |
| August | 5.15 m/s | 1,154 kWh | $168 |
| September | 6.15 m/s | 1,711 kWh | $249 |
| October | 6.66 m/s | 2,088 kWh | $304 |
| November | 6.81 m/s | 2,112 kWh | $307 |
| December | 6.63 m/s | 2,071 kWh | $301 |
What a taller tower would buy
Measured at 10 m the wind in Calhoun County averages 5.06 m/s; at 50 m it is 7.14 m/s. That gives a shear exponent of 0.214, typical of ordinary open country. Going from 20 m to 50 m takes output from 18,733 to 28,038 kWh a year, 50% more, before counting the extra cost of the taller tower. Why tower height decides it explains the shear behind these numbers.
| Hub height | Average wind | Output | Payback |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20 m | 5.87 m/s | 18,733 kWh | 37 years |
| 30 m | 6.4 m/s | 22,674 kWh | 30 years |
| 40 m | 6.81 m/s | 25,653 kWh | 27 years |
| 50 m | 7.14 m/s | 28,038 kWh | 25 years |
Counties around Calhoun County
3 of the 6 closest counties are windier at turbine height; the windiest, Sac County, averages 6.45 m/s.
- Sac County, IA: 6.45 m/s, 23,038 kWh, payback 30 years (24 mi)
- Webster County, IA: 6.4 m/s, 22,669 kWh, payback 30 years (24 mi)
- Pocahontas County, IA: 6.4 m/s, 22,669 kWh, payback 30 years (24 mi)
- Carroll County, IA: 6.42 m/s, 22,817 kWh, payback 30 years (27 mi)
- Greene County, IA: 6.31 m/s, 22,003 kWh, payback 31 years (27 mi)
- Buena Vista County, IA: 6.45 m/s, 23,038 kWh, payback 30 years (35 mi)
Sun versus wind in Calhoun County
Calhoun County gets 4.06 kWh of sunshine per square metre a day on average. One kW of solar panels here would make roughly 1,186 kWh a year; one kW of the turbine above makes 2,267. This is one of the rare places where a kilowatt of turbine out-produces a kilowatt of panels, by 1.9 times. Panel output assumes an 80% system performance ratio. Wind or solar runs the same comparison for every county.
How this is worked out
Wind is NASA's Power climate record, the 2001-2025 average at 10 m and 50 m for the county's centre, carried to 30 m with this county's own measured wind shear and spread into hours with a Rayleigh distribution. The turbine is a generic 10 kW, 7 m rotor machine with 10% losses. Cost is $10,000 per kW installed with no tax credit, because the federal one ended in 2025. One county-centre number cannot see your hilltop or your tree line, so treat it as the starting point for a site survey, not a substitute. The full method and its weak spots are in how the numbers are made.