Wind Turbine Payback in Linn County, IA
Wind turbine payback in Linn County
No. The turbine wears out before it pays for itself.
At 30 m, the height a home turbine tower usually reaches, the wind in Linn County, IA averages 6.07 m/s (13.6 mph). A 10 kW turbine there would make about 20,223 kWh a year, worth $2,942 at IA's 14.55¢/kWh. Against an installed cost of about $100,000, that is a payback of 34 years, and the turbine is built to last about 20.
What to do in Linn County
A home turbine is not worth buying for savings in Linn County unless your spot is far windier than the county average, 8.1 m/s at the hub against 6.07 m/s here. Per kW, solar panels would make about 1,156 kWh a year here against the turbine's 2,022, so get a solar quote first.
What would have to change
- Power would have to cost 25¢/kWh, 1.7 times what IA pays now.
- Or the average wind at the hub would have to be 8.1 m/s instead of 6.07. A taller tower or an exposed ridge can add some of that; a rooftop never will.
Against the rest of IA
Linn County is the 717th windiest of 3,144 US counties at turbine height; the national middle is 4.79 m/s. The windiest in IA is Dickinson County at 6.59 m/s, payback 29 years.
Month by month in Linn County
April is the strongest month here, at 7.02 m/s and about 2,233 kWh. August is the weakest, 4.77 m/s and 937 kWh, so the best month makes 2.4 times the worst. November to March brings in 48% of the year's output in Linn County.
| Month | Wind at 30 m | Output | Worth |
|---|---|---|---|
| January | 6.50 m/s | 1,988 kWh | $289 |
| February | 6.53 m/s | 1,811 kWh | $264 |
| March | 6.70 m/s | 2,111 kWh | $307 |
| April | 7.02 m/s | 2,233 kWh | $325 |
| May | 6.26 m/s | 1,837 kWh | $267 |
| June | 5.45 m/s | 1,288 kWh | $187 |
| July | 4.77 m/s | 937 kWh | $136 |
| August | 4.77 m/s | 937 kWh | $136 |
| September | 5.67 m/s | 1,421 kWh | $207 |
| October | 6.38 m/s | 1,910 kWh | $278 |
| November | 6.55 m/s | 1,951 kWh | $284 |
| December | 6.30 m/s | 1,865 kWh | $271 |
What a taller tower would buy
Measured at 10 m the wind in Linn County averages 4.73 m/s; at 50 m it is 6.82 m/s. That gives a shear exponent of 0.227, typical of ordinary open country. Going from 20 m to 50 m takes output from 16,321 to 25,747 kWh a year, 58% more, before counting the extra cost of the taller tower. Why tower height decides it explains the shear behind these numbers.
| Hub height | Average wind | Output | Payback |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20 m | 5.54 m/s | 16,321 kWh | 42 years |
| 30 m | 6.07 m/s | 20,247 kWh | 34 years |
| 40 m | 6.48 m/s | 23,283 kWh | 30 years |
| 50 m | 6.82 m/s | 25,747 kWh | 27 years |
Counties around Linn County
1 of the 6 closest counties is windier at turbine height; the windiest, Buchanan County, averages 6.11 m/s.
- Benton County, IA: 6.07 m/s, 20,223 kWh, payback 34 years (24 mi)
- Jones County, IA: 6.01 m/s, 19,778 kWh, payback 35 years (25 mi)
- Johnson County, IA: 6.03 m/s, 19,926 kWh, payback 35 years (28 mi)
- Delaware County, IA: 6.06 m/s, 20,149 kWh, payback 34 years (30 mi)
- Buchanan County, IA: 6.11 m/s, 20,520 kWh, payback 34 years (30 mi)
- Cedar County, IA: 6.01 m/s, 19,778 kWh, payback 35 years (32 mi)
Sun versus wind in Linn County
Linn County gets 3.96 kWh of sunshine per square metre a day on average. One kW of solar panels here would make roughly 1,156 kWh a year; one kW of the turbine above makes 2,022. This is one of the rare places where a kilowatt of turbine out-produces a kilowatt of panels, by 1.7 times. Panel output assumes an 80% system performance ratio. Wind or solar runs the same comparison for every county.
How this is worked out
Wind is NASA's Power climate record, the 2001-2025 average at 10 m and 50 m for the county's centre, carried to 30 m with this county's own measured wind shear and spread into hours with a Rayleigh distribution. The turbine is a generic 10 kW, 7 m rotor machine with 10% losses. Cost is $10,000 per kW installed with no tax credit, because the federal one ended in 2025. One county-centre number cannot see your hilltop or your tree line, so treat it as the starting point for a site survey, not a substitute. The full method and its weak spots are in how the numbers are made.