Wind Turbine Payback in Livingston County, IL
Wind turbine payback in Livingston County
No. The turbine wears out before it pays for itself.
At 30 m, the height a home turbine tower usually reaches, the wind in Livingston County, IL averages 6.04 m/s (13.5 mph). A 10 kW turbine there would make about 20,001 kWh a year, worth $3,846 at IL's 19.23¢/kWh. Against an installed cost of about $100,000, that is a payback of 26 years, and the turbine is built to last about 20.
What to do in Livingston County
A home turbine is not worth buying for savings in Livingston County unless your spot is far windier than the county average, 6.8 m/s at the hub against 6.04 m/s here. Per kW, solar panels would make about 1,174 kWh a year here against the turbine's 2,000, so get a solar quote first.
What would have to change
- Power would have to cost 25¢/kWh, 1.3 times what IL pays now.
- Or the average wind at the hub would have to be 6.8 m/s instead of 6.04. A taller tower or an exposed ridge can add some of that; a rooftop never will.
Against the rest of IL
Livingston County is the 784th windiest of 3,144 US counties at turbine height; the national middle is 4.79 m/s. The windiest in IL is Cook County at 6.73 m/s, payback 21 years.
Month by month in Livingston County
April is the strongest month here, at 7.03 m/s and about 2,242 kWh. August is the weakest, 4.54 m/s and 812 kWh, so the best month makes 2.8 times the worst. November to March brings in 50% of the year's output in Livingston County.
| Month | Wind at 30 m | Output | Worth |
|---|---|---|---|
| January | 6.69 m/s | 2,109 kWh | $406 |
| February | 6.61 m/s | 1,860 kWh | $358 |
| March | 6.69 m/s | 2,104 kWh | $405 |
| April | 7.03 m/s | 2,242 kWh | $431 |
| May | 6.13 m/s | 1,757 kWh | $338 |
| June | 5.32 m/s | 1,213 kWh | $233 |
| July | 4.61 m/s | 849 kWh | $163 |
| August | 4.54 m/s | 812 kWh | $156 |
| September | 5.37 m/s | 1,239 kWh | $238 |
| October | 6.36 m/s | 1,898 kWh | $365 |
| November | 6.75 m/s | 2,073 kWh | $399 |
| December | 6.53 m/s | 2,009 kWh | $386 |
What a taller tower would buy
Measured at 10 m the wind in Livingston County averages 4.72 m/s; at 50 m it is 6.78 m/s. That gives a shear exponent of 0.225, typical of ordinary open country. Going from 20 m to 50 m takes output from 16,159 to 25,457 kWh a year, 58% more, before counting the extra cost of the taller tower. Why tower height decides it explains the shear behind these numbers.
| Hub height | Average wind | Output | Payback |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20 m | 5.52 m/s | 16,159 kWh | 32 years |
| 30 m | 6.04 m/s | 20,029 kWh | 26 years |
| 40 m | 6.45 m/s | 23,024 kWh | 23 years |
| 50 m | 6.78 m/s | 25,457 kWh | 20 years |
Counties around Livingston County
3 of the 6 closest counties are windier at turbine height; the windiest, McLean County, averages 6.13 m/s.
- Ford County, IL: 6.07 m/s, 20,223 kWh, payback 26 years (27 mi)
- Grundy County, IL: 5.98 m/s, 19,556 kWh, payback 27 years (29 mi)
- McLean County, IL: 6.13 m/s, 20,668 kWh, payback 25 years (32 mi)
- Woodford County, IL: 6.03 m/s, 19,926 kWh, payback 26 years (35 mi)
- LaSalle County, IL: 5.98 m/s, 19,556 kWh, payback 27 years (36 mi)
- Iroquois County, IL: 6.07 m/s, 20,223 kWh, payback 26 years (39 mi)
Sun versus wind in Livingston County
Livingston County gets 4.02 kWh of sunshine per square metre a day on average. One kW of solar panels here would make roughly 1,174 kWh a year; one kW of the turbine above makes 2,000. This is one of the rare places where a kilowatt of turbine out-produces a kilowatt of panels, by 1.7 times. Panel output assumes an 80% system performance ratio. Wind or solar runs the same comparison for every county.
How this is worked out
Wind is NASA's Power climate record, the 2001-2025 average at 10 m and 50 m for the county's centre, carried to 30 m with this county's own measured wind shear and spread into hours with a Rayleigh distribution. The turbine is a generic 10 kW, 7 m rotor machine with 10% losses. Cost is $10,000 per kW installed with no tax credit, because the federal one ended in 2025. One county-centre number cannot see your hilltop or your tree line, so treat it as the starting point for a site survey, not a substitute. The full method and its weak spots are in how the numbers are made.