Wind Turbine Payback in Wright County, IA
Wind turbine payback in Wright County
No. The turbine wears out before it pays for itself.
At 30 m, the height a home turbine tower usually reaches, the wind in Wright County, IA averages 6.4 m/s (14.3 mph). A 10 kW turbine there would make about 22,669 kWh a year, worth $3,298 at IA's 14.55¢/kWh. Against an installed cost of about $100,000, that is a payback of 30 years, and the turbine is built to last about 20.
What to do in Wright County
A home turbine is not worth buying for savings in Wright County unless your spot is far windier than the county average, 8.1 m/s at the hub against 6.4 m/s here. Per kW, solar panels would make about 1,177 kWh a year here against the turbine's 2,267, so get a solar quote first.
What would have to change
- Power would have to cost 22¢/kWh, 1.5 times what IA pays now.
- Or the average wind at the hub would have to be 8.1 m/s instead of 6.4. A taller tower or an exposed ridge can add some of that; a rooftop never will.
Against the rest of IA
Wright County is the 322nd windiest of 3,144 US counties at turbine height; the national middle is 4.79 m/s. The windiest in IA is Dickinson County at 6.59 m/s, payback 29 years.
Month by month in Wright County
April is the strongest month here, at 7.34 m/s and about 2,418 kWh. August is the weakest, 5.11 m/s and 1,127 kWh, so the best month makes 2.1 times the worst. November to March brings in 47% of the year's output in Wright County.
| Month | Wind at 30 m | Output | Worth |
|---|---|---|---|
| January | 6.78 m/s | 2,164 kWh | $315 |
| February | 6.77 m/s | 1,949 kWh | $284 |
| March | 6.96 m/s | 2,274 kWh | $331 |
| April | 7.34 m/s | 2,418 kWh | $352 |
| May | 6.67 m/s | 2,092 kWh | $304 |
| June | 5.88 m/s | 1,545 kWh | $225 |
| July | 5.12 m/s | 1,132 kWh | $165 |
| August | 5.11 m/s | 1,127 kWh | $164 |
| September | 6.11 m/s | 1,687 kWh | $245 |
| October | 6.66 m/s | 2,086 kWh | $304 |
| November | 6.84 m/s | 2,126 kWh | $309 |
| December | 6.65 m/s | 2,080 kWh | $303 |
What a taller tower would buy
Measured at 10 m the wind in Wright County averages 5.05 m/s; at 50 m it is 7.14 m/s. That gives a shear exponent of 0.215, typical of ordinary open country. Going from 20 m to 50 m takes output from 18,693 to 28,038 kWh a year, 50% more, before counting the extra cost of the taller tower. Why tower height decides it explains the shear behind these numbers.
| Hub height | Average wind | Output | Payback |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20 m | 5.86 m/s | 18,693 kWh | 37 years |
| 30 m | 6.4 m/s | 22,649 kWh | 30 years |
| 40 m | 6.81 m/s | 25,642 kWh | 27 years |
| 50 m | 7.14 m/s | 28,038 kWh | 25 years |
Counties around Wright County
2 of the 6 closest counties are windier at turbine height; the windiest, Humboldt County, averages 6.46 m/s.
- Franklin County, IA: 6.32 m/s, 22,077 kWh, payback 31 years (24 mi)
- Hancock County, IA: 6.44 m/s, 22,964 kWh, payback 30 years (24 mi)
- Hamilton County, IA: 6.4 m/s, 22,669 kWh, payback 30 years (24 mi)
- Humboldt County, IA: 6.46 m/s, 23,112 kWh, payback 30 years (24 mi)
- Webster County, IA: 6.4 m/s, 22,669 kWh, payback 30 years (31 mi)
- Cerro Gordo County, IA: 6.33 m/s, 22,151 kWh, payback 31 years (34 mi)
Sun versus wind in Wright County
Wright County gets 4.03 kWh of sunshine per square metre a day on average. One kW of solar panels here would make roughly 1,177 kWh a year; one kW of the turbine above makes 2,267. This is one of the rare places where a kilowatt of turbine out-produces a kilowatt of panels, by 1.9 times. Panel output assumes an 80% system performance ratio. Wind or solar runs the same comparison for every county.
How this is worked out
Wind is NASA's Power climate record, the 2001-2025 average at 10 m and 50 m for the county's centre, carried to 30 m with this county's own measured wind shear and spread into hours with a Rayleigh distribution. The turbine is a generic 10 kW, 7 m rotor machine with 10% losses. Cost is $10,000 per kW installed with no tax credit, because the federal one ended in 2025. One county-centre number cannot see your hilltop or your tree line, so treat it as the starting point for a site survey, not a substitute. The full method and its weak spots are in how the numbers are made.