Wind Turbine Payback in Boyd County, NE
Wind turbine payback in Boyd County
No. The turbine wears out before it pays for itself.
At 30 m, the height a home turbine tower usually reaches, the wind in Boyd County, NE averages 6.52 m/s (14.6 mph). A 10 kW turbine there would make about 23,554 kWh a year, worth $3,043 at NE's 12.92¢/kWh. Against an installed cost of about $100,000, that is a payback of 33 years, and the turbine is built to last about 20.
What to do in Boyd County
A home turbine is not worth buying for savings in Boyd County unless your spot is far windier than the county average, 8.8 m/s at the hub against 6.52 m/s here. Per kW, solar panels would make about 1,244 kWh a year here against the turbine's 2,355, so get a solar quote first.
What would have to change
- Power would have to cost 21¢/kWh, 1.6 times what NE pays now.
- Or the average wind at the hub would have to be 8.8 m/s instead of 6.52. A taller tower or an exposed ridge can add some of that; a rooftop never will.
Against the rest of NE
Boyd County is the 180th windiest of 3,144 US counties at turbine height; the national middle is 4.79 m/s. The windiest in NE is Cherry County at 6.83 m/s, payback 30 years.
Month by month in Boyd County
April is the strongest month here, at 7.07 m/s and about 2,262 kWh. July is the weakest, 5.54 m/s and 1,388 kWh, so the best month makes 1.6 times the worst. November to March brings in 45% of the year's output in Boyd County.
| Month | Wind at 30 m | Output | Worth |
|---|---|---|---|
| January | 6.86 m/s | 2,212 kWh | $286 |
| February | 6.66 m/s | 1,888 kWh | $244 |
| March | 6.84 m/s | 2,201 kWh | $284 |
| April | 7.07 m/s | 2,262 kWh | $292 |
| May | 6.66 m/s | 2,090 kWh | $270 |
| June | 6.05 m/s | 1,647 kWh | $213 |
| July | 5.54 m/s | 1,388 kWh | $179 |
| August | 5.60 m/s | 1,422 kWh | $184 |
| September | 6.58 m/s | 1,974 kWh | $255 |
| October | 6.85 m/s | 2,207 kWh | $285 |
| November | 6.84 m/s | 2,130 kWh | $275 |
| December | 6.72 m/s | 2,124 kWh | $274 |
What a taller tower would buy
Measured at 10 m the wind in Boyd County averages 5.16 m/s; at 50 m it is 7.27 m/s. That gives a shear exponent of 0.213, typical of ordinary open country. Going from 20 m to 50 m takes output from 19,563 to 28,951 kWh a year, 48% more, before counting the extra cost of the taller tower. Why tower height decides it explains the shear behind these numbers.
| Hub height | Average wind | Output | Payback |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20 m | 5.98 m/s | 19,563 kWh | 40 years |
| 30 m | 6.52 m/s | 23,558 kWh | 33 years |
| 40 m | 6.93 m/s | 26,559 kWh | 29 years |
| 50 m | 7.27 m/s | 28,951 kWh | 27 years |
Counties around Boyd County
3 of the 6 closest counties are windier at turbine height; the windiest, Rock County, averages 6.73 m/s.
- Charles Mix County, SD: 6.52 m/s, 23,554 kWh, payback 29 years (23 mi)
- Gregory County, SD: 6.65 m/s, 24,509 kWh, payback 28 years (29 mi)
- Holt County, NE: 6.68 m/s, 24,728 kWh, payback 31 years (30 mi)
- Douglas County, SD: 6.4 m/s, 22,669 kWh, payback 30 years (40 mi)
- Bon Homme County, SD: 6.45 m/s, 23,038 kWh, payback 30 years (45 mi)
- Rock County, NE: 6.73 m/s, 25,093 kWh, payback 31 years (48 mi)
Sun versus wind in Boyd County
Boyd County gets 4.26 kWh of sunshine per square metre a day on average. One kW of solar panels here would make roughly 1,244 kWh a year; one kW of the turbine above makes 2,355. This is one of the rare places where a kilowatt of turbine out-produces a kilowatt of panels, by 1.9 times. Panel output assumes an 80% system performance ratio. Wind or solar runs the same comparison for every county.
How this is worked out
Wind is NASA's Power climate record, the 2001-2025 average at 10 m and 50 m for the county's centre, carried to 30 m with this county's own measured wind shear and spread into hours with a Rayleigh distribution. The turbine is a generic 10 kW, 7 m rotor machine with 10% losses. Cost is $10,000 per kW installed with no tax credit, because the federal one ended in 2025. One county-centre number cannot see your hilltop or your tree line, so treat it as the starting point for a site survey, not a substitute. The full method and its weak spots are in how the numbers are made.