Wind Turbine Payback in Sullivan County, NH
Wind turbine payback in Sullivan County
No. The turbine wears out before it pays for itself.
At 30 m, the height a home turbine tower usually reaches, the wind in Sullivan County, NH averages 3.58 m/s (8 mph). A 10 kW turbine there would make about 4,653 kWh a year, worth $1,252 at NH's 26.91¢/kWh. Against an installed cost of about $100,000, that is a payback of 80 years, and the turbine is built to last about 20.
What to do in Sullivan County
A home turbine is not worth buying for savings in Sullivan County unless your spot is far windier than the county average, 5.8 m/s at the hub against 3.58 m/s here. Per kW, solar panels would make about 1,069 kWh a year here against the turbine's 465, so get a solar quote first.
What would have to change
- Power would have to cost 107¢/kWh, 4.0 times what NH pays now.
- Or the average wind at the hub would have to be 5.8 m/s instead of 3.58. A taller tower or an exposed ridge can add some of that; a rooftop never will.
Against the rest of NH
Sullivan County is the 2,429th windiest of 3,144 US counties at turbine height; the national middle is 4.79 m/s. The windiest in NH is Cheshire County at 3.64 m/s, payback 76 years.
Month by month in Sullivan County
February is the strongest month here, at 4.45 m/s and about 695 kWh. August is the weakest, 2.83 m/s and 180 kWh, so the best month makes 3.9 times the worst. November to March brings in 60% of the year's output in Sullivan County.
| Month | Wind at 30 m | Output | Worth |
|---|---|---|---|
| January | 4.22 m/s | 657 kWh | $177 |
| February | 4.45 m/s | 695 kWh | $187 |
| March | 4.29 m/s | 691 kWh | $186 |
| April | 3.99 m/s | 535 kWh | $144 |
| May | 3.37 m/s | 324 kWh | $87 |
| June | 3.04 m/s | 223 kWh | $60 |
| July | 2.85 m/s | 185 kWh | $50 |
| August | 2.83 m/s | 180 kWh | $48 |
| September | 3.00 m/s | 213 kWh | $57 |
| October | 3.42 m/s | 342 kWh | $92 |
| November | 3.64 m/s | 403 kWh | $108 |
| December | 3.91 m/s | 522 kWh | $140 |
What a taller tower would buy
Measured at 10 m the wind in Sullivan County averages 2.25 m/s; at 50 m it is 4.45 m/s. That gives a shear exponent of 0.424, typical of rough, sheltered ground: trees or buildings slow the low wind a lot. Going from 20 m to 50 m takes output from 2,653 to 9,041 kWh a year, 241% more, before counting the extra cost of the taller tower. Why tower height decides it explains the shear behind these numbers.
| Hub height | Average wind | Output | Payback |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20 m | 3.02 m/s | 2,653 kWh | over 100 years |
| 30 m | 3.58 m/s | 4,667 kWh | 80 years |
| 40 m | 4.05 m/s | 6,822 kWh | 55 years |
| 50 m | 4.45 m/s | 9,041 kWh | 41 years |
Counties around Sullivan County
2 of the 6 closest counties are windier at turbine height; the windiest, Cheshire County, averages 3.64 m/s.
- Windsor County, VT: 3.58 m/s, 4,653 kWh, payback 90 years (24 mi)
- Merrimack County, NH: 3.58 m/s, 4,653 kWh, payback 80 years (28 mi)
- Cheshire County, NH: 3.64 m/s, 4,905 kWh, payback 76 years (30 mi)
- Windham County, VT: 3.64 m/s, 4,905 kWh, payback 85 years (36 mi)
- Hillsborough County, NH: 3.54 m/s, 4,489 kWh, payback 83 years (40 mi)
- Belknap County, NH: 3.58 m/s, 4,653 kWh, payback 80 years (41 mi)
Sun versus wind in Sullivan County
Sullivan County gets 3.66 kWh of sunshine per square metre a day on average. One kW of solar panels here would make roughly 1,069 kWh a year; one kW of the turbine above makes 465. Kilowatt for kilowatt, panels make 2.3 times as much here as the turbine. Panel output assumes an 80% system performance ratio. Wind or solar runs the same comparison for every county.
How this is worked out
Wind is NASA's Power climate record, the 2001-2025 average at 10 m and 50 m for the county's centre, carried to 30 m with this county's own measured wind shear and spread into hours with a Rayleigh distribution. The turbine is a generic 10 kW, 7 m rotor machine with 10% losses. Cost is $10,000 per kW installed with no tax credit, because the federal one ended in 2025. One county-centre number cannot see your hilltop or your tree line, so treat it as the starting point for a site survey, not a substitute. The full method and its weak spots are in how the numbers are made.